Your Custom Quiz

In Huels 2025 et al., on second-generation screw cup THA, what was the primary functional outcome observed in dogs following SCSL THA?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. 26 out of 30 hips had full functional recovery, including one revised for stem subsidence.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Full recovery in most hips.
26 out of 30 hips had full functional recovery, including one revised for stem subsidence.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Total complication rate was 16.7%, with 5/30 hips experiencing major complications, mostly related to the femoral component.
  • Cup-associated complications were rare (3.3%), with only one case of acetabular cup luxation attributed to surgical technique rather than implant failure.
  • No cases of late aseptic loosening were observed during a median follow-up of 17.5 months.
  • Implant stability was attributed to the SCSL's porous, trabecular titanium surface, enhancing osseointegration.
  • Three femoral stem fractures occurred in a single dog, leading to implant removal; material testing was not performed.
  • Most complications were femoral in origin (6/7), not acetabular, suggesting improved performance of the SCSL.
  • Explantation rate was 13% (4/30), but some removals were due to owner preference against revision.
  • Subjective functional outcome was full recovery in 26/30 hips, including one with successful revision of stem subsidence.

Huels

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology

2

2025

Complications and Long-Term Outcome in 30 Canine Total Hip Arthroplasties Using a Second-Generation Selective Laser Melted Screw Cup

2025-2-VCOT-huels-5

Article Title: Complications and Long-Term Outcome in 30 Canine Total Hip Arthroplasties Using a Second-Generation Selective Laser Melted Screw Cup

Journal: Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology

In Anderson 2024 et al., what recommendation did authors give to help detect this complication early?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Only routine in-person gait assessments identified this nerve injury, not owner observation:contentReference[oaicite:4]{index=4}
Incorrect. The correct answer is Routine post-op gait assessments.
Only routine in-person gait assessments identified this nerve injury, not owner observation:contentReference[oaicite:4]{index=4}

🔍 Key Findings Summary

  • 3 dogs developed permanent fibular nerve dysfunction following TPLO
  • Common findings:
    • Drill hole or screw in caudal tibial cortex just distal to osteotomy
    • Caudal malpositioning of TPLO plate (esp. right limb of case 3)
    • Post-op signs: cranial tibial atrophy, knuckling, exaggerated gait, no hock flexion
  • One case had confirmed deep/superficial fibular neuropathy via electrodiagnostics
  • Recommended prevention: avoid overly caudal drill paths; careful gait assessment at follow-up is key

Anderson

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

3

2024

Permanent Iatrogenic Fibular Nerve Injury following Tibial Plateau Levelling Osteotomy

2024-3-VCOT-anderson-5

Article Title: Permanent Iatrogenic Fibular Nerve Injury following Tibial Plateau Levelling Osteotomy

Journal: Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

In Sandoval 2024 et al., on lung lobectomy technique outcomes, what was the most common intraoperative complication?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Hemorrhage occurred in 11.8% of lobectomies and was the most frequently observed intraoperative issue.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Intraoperative hemorrhage.
Hemorrhage occurred in 11.8% of lobectomies and was the most frequently observed intraoperative issue.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Intra- and postoperative complications occurred only in stapled lobectomies, but the difference was not statistically significant (intra: p = .069, post: p = .112).
  • Intraoperative hemorrhage was the most common complication (11.8%), followed by air leakage (2%).
  • All self-ligating loop (SLL) lobectomies had zero complications (n=18), though the sample was small.
  • Postoperative complications included 4 catastrophic events (cardiopulmonary arrest), all in stapled cases.
  • Lung lobectomy technique was not associated with duration of chest tube use, hospitalization, or survival (p > .05).
  • 94.3% of patients survived to discharge (82/87).
  • SLLs are lower-cost and may be more feasible for thoracoscopic/minimally invasive approaches due to smaller port size (5mm vs. 12mm for staplers).
  • A future superiority study would need ≥103 lobectomies per group to assess differences in complication rates.

Sandoval

Veterinary Surgery

7

2024

Short‐term outcomes of dogs and cats undergoing lung lobectomy using either a self-ligating loop or a thoracoabdominal stapler

2024-7-VS-sandoval-2

Article Title: Short‐term outcomes of dogs and cats undergoing lung lobectomy using either a self-ligating loop or a thoracoabdominal stapler

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Miller 2024 et al., on staple vs. hand-sewn feline GI techniques, how did HSE compare to SSE in terms of construct completion time and leak resistance?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. HSE took 8x longer than SSE but had much higher leak pressure tolerance.
Incorrect. The correct answer is HSE was slower but more secure.
HSE took 8x longer than SSE but had much higher leak pressure tolerance.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Skin staple anastomosis (SSA) had comparable leak pressures to hand-sewn anastomosis (HSA) but required half the time to complete.
  • Skin staple enterotomy (SSE) had significantly lower leak pressures than hand-sewn enterotomy (HSE) and failed in 12/20 constructs during pressure testing.
  • HSE constructs took 8× longer to complete than SSE, but had much higher intraluminal pressure tolerance.
  • All SSE constructs leaked from the center, with 35% leaking immediately and 60% showing catastrophic failure.
  • SSA leakage occurred at the center in 40% of constructs, likely due to a learning curve in early samples.
  • All constructs had higher pressures than normal physiologic intestinal pressure (4.0 mmHg ±2.0), except some SSEs with immediate leaks.
  • Authors recommend SSA as a viable alternative with appropriate training but do not recommend SSE using the tested technique in live cats.
  • Staple size and placement technique are key factors; smaller or more precisely placed staples may reduce leak risk.

Miller

Veterinary Surgery

4

2024

Performance time and leak pressure of hand-sewn and skin staple intestinal anastomoses and enterotomies in cadaveric cats

2024-4-VS-miller-4

Article Title: Performance time and leak pressure of hand-sewn and skin staple intestinal anastomoses and enterotomies in cadaveric cats

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Cruciani 2025 et al., on portal placement, what functional outcome was observed in most dogs at long-term follow-up?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. 11 of 14 dogs had full or acceptable function at long-term follow-up.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Acceptable or full function in majority.
11 of 14 dogs had full or acceptable function at long-term follow-up.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Study Design: Retrospective case series of 15 dogs (19 tarsi) with talar OCD.
  • Technique: Modified arthroscopic approach with both scope and instrument portals on the same side as the lesion.
  • Outcomes:
    • Good to excellent mid-to-long-term outcomes in 11/14 dogs.
    • Statistically significant improvement in CBPI (p < .05) and VAS scores (p < .05).
    • Minor postoperative complications (synovial cysts) in 4/13 tarsi, all resolved spontaneously.
    • No major intraoperative complications; 1/19 required mini-arthrotomy due to fragment size.
  • Degenerative Joint Disease (DJD): Progression noted in 10/14 cases, despite good functional outcomes.
  • Fragment Characteristics: Multiple osteochondral fragments were present in most cases, with 17/19 lesions on the medial talar ridge.
  • Technical Advantage: Lower conversion rate to arthrotomy (1/19) compared to previous studies (Gielen et al. and Miller & Beale).

Cruciani

Veterinary Surgery

1

2025

A modified approach to portal placement for arthroscopic management of osteochondritis dissecans lesions of the tarsocrural joint in 15 dogs (19 tarsi)

2025-1-VS-cruciani-2

Article Title: A modified approach to portal placement for arthroscopic management of osteochondritis dissecans lesions of the tarsocrural joint in 15 dogs (19 tarsi)

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Tobias 2025 et al., on frontal sinus mucoceles, what was a common minor postoperative complication seen in some dogs?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Minor complications included transient swelling or nasal discharge; no major intraoperative issues were reported.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Swelling and nasal discharge.
Minor complications included transient swelling or nasal discharge; no major intraoperative issues were reported.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Frontal sinus mucoceles occurred in young dogs, often linked to prior skull trauma by 10 months of age.
  • All dogs presented with expansile, fluid-filled lesions causing facial swelling; CT showed multicentric bone erosion, including the frontal bone and cribriform plate.
  • Surgical options included frontal sinusotomy with either sinus lining ablation or re-establishment of nasofrontal drainage, with or without stenting.
  • Nasofrontal stenting led to long-term resolution in most dogs, although recurrence occurred in 4/8 dogs, requiring revision surgery in 3.
  • Complications were minor and included swelling or nasal discharge; no intraoperative complications were reported.
  • Histology confirmed sterile mucoceles with neutrophilic inflammation and mucin, and cultures were negative in all cases.
  • Guaifenesin was used postoperatively in several cases to reduce mucus viscosity; its benefit is unproven in dogs but may support drainage.

Tobias

Veterinary Surgery

6

2025

Clinical findings and outcomes of eight dogs with surgically treated frontal sinus mucoceles

2025-6-VS-tobias-4

Article Title: Clinical findings and outcomes of eight dogs with surgically treated frontal sinus mucoceles

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Woelfel 2022 et al., on cervical locked facets, which imaging sign was associated with this injury on CT?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. The reverse hamburger bun sign describes loss of normal facet congruity seen on CT at the site of locked facet.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Reverse hamburger bun sign.
The reverse hamburger bun sign describes loss of normal facet congruity seen on CT at the site of locked facet.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Locked facet injuries in dogs involved unilateral dorsal displacement of the cranial articular process of the caudal vertebra, most commonly at C5/6 or C6/7.
  • All affected dogs were small/toy breeds, typically following trauma (most often attacks by larger dogs).
  • Neurologic severity ranged from ambulatory tetraparesis to tetraplegia, often with thoracic limb deficits more severe than pelvic limbs — suggesting a central cord syndrome-like pattern.
  • CT and MRI revealed axial rotation, subluxation, and articular process displacement; MRI showed T2 hyperintensity, nerve root impingement, and soft tissue changes.
  • Surgical treatment included ventral fixation with screws, pins, and PMMA, and one case required dorsal facetectomy for reduction.
  • Medical management, including external coaptation or rest, also resulted in functional recovery in select cases.
  • All dogs with follow-up data (8/8) had functional recovery, with nonambulatory dogs regaining ambulation in a median of 4 weeks.
  • No consistent differences in outcome were observed between surgical and nonsurgical management, suggesting locked facets may be biomechanically stable.

Woelfel

Veterinary Surgery

1

2022

Subaxial cervical articular process subluxation and dislocation: Cervical locked facet injuries in dogs

2022-1-VS-woelfel-2

Article Title: Subaxial cervical articular process subluxation and dislocation: Cervical locked facet injuries in dogs

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Lampart 2023 et al., on manual laxity testing, what was the interobserver agreement for cranial tibial translation (CTT) across all manual laxity tests?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. CTT had an ICC > 0.9 across all tests, indicating excellent interobserver reliability.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Excellent.
CTT had an ICC > 0.9 across all tests, indicating excellent interobserver reliability.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Cranial drawer (CD), tibial compression (TCT), and tibial pivot compression test (TPCT) showed 100% sensitivity and specificity in differentiating intact from CCL-deficient stifles in this ex vivo model.
  • TPCT elicited the highest cranial tibial translation (CTT) and internal tibial rotation, though differences in rotation did not reach statistical significance.
  • Inter- and intraobserver agreement for CTT was excellent across all tests (ICC >0.9).
  • Rotation and force application had greater variability, particularly with less experienced observers and during CD.
  • Forces applied during CD were significantly higher in intact limbs and correlated with observer experience.
  • Subjective CTT estimates strongly correlated with objective kinematic measurements (r = 0.895), with a median absolute error of 1.31 mm.
  • TPCT may be particularly useful for assessing rotational instability, mimicking the pivot-shift test used in human ACL exams.
  • Study supports development of a grading system for manual laxity testing, especially in acute CCLR cases.

Lampart

Veterinary Surgery

5

2023

Evaluation of the accuracy and intra‐ and interobserver reliability of three manual laxity tests for canine cranial cruciate ligament rupture—An ex vivo kinetic and kinematic study

2023-5-VS-lampart-2

Article Title: Evaluation of the accuracy and intra‐ and interobserver reliability of three manual laxity tests for canine cranial cruciate ligament rupture—An ex vivo kinetic and kinematic study

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Mattioli 2025 et al., on lymphadenectomy complications, which intraoperative guidance technique was associated with the lowest complication rate?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. The study found no significant difference in complication rates among the different intraoperative guidance techniques (p = .255).
Incorrect. The correct answer is No significant difference.
The study found no significant difference in complication rates among the different intraoperative guidance techniques (p = .255).

🔍 Key Findings

Sample: 201 lymphadenectomies in 163 dogs.
Intraoperative techniques:

  • Unassisted: 36%
  • Methylene blue (MB): 24%
  • Gamma probe + MB (γ-MB): 40%

Complication rate: 7.5% overall (93% uncomplicated)

  • 80% were mild, 20% moderate; no severe complications
  • Most common = seroma (2.5%), lymphoedema (1.5%)

Risk factors (via decision tree model):

  • Surgical time > 21.5 min
  • Lymph node site = mandibular or retropharyngeal

No significant difference in complication rate based on:

  • Guidance technique (p = .255)
  • LN palpability, number removed, or LN size

Clinical implication: Peripheral SLN excision is safe regardless of intraoperative technique; certain sites and durations carry slightly higher risk.

Mattioli

Veterinary Surgery

4

2025

Peripheral sentinel lymphadenectomy in 163 dogs: Postoperative surgical complications and comparison between intraoperative dissection techniques

2025-4-VS-mattioli-2

Article Title: Peripheral sentinel lymphadenectomy in 163 dogs: Postoperative surgical complications and comparison between intraoperative dissection techniques

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Buote 2023 et al., on feline laparoscopic cannulas, what intraoperative complication was reduced when using only 3DPCs?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Cannula pullout events significantly decreased from 10 to 2.2 with use of 3DPCs (p = 0.03):contentReference[oaicite:1]{index=1}.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Cannula pullout and CO₂ leakage.
Cannula pullout events significantly decreased from 10 to 2.2 with use of 3DPCs (p = 0.03):contentReference[oaicite:1]{index=1}.

🔍 Key Findings

  • 3D-printed cannulas (3DPCs) reduced mean surgical time significantly in cadaveric procedures (125.6 vs 95.2 min, p = 0.03).
  • Cannula pullout events decreased from a mean of 10 to 2.2 per procedure when using only 3DPCs (p = 0.03).
  • Instrument collisions were significantly fewer with 3DPCs (6.8 vs 2.6 collisions, p = 0.03).
  • Live patients experienced no postoperative complications, including no incision site infections or discomfort.
  • Initial versions of 3DPCs had minor issues, including valve leakage and looser trocar fit, requiring surgical workarounds.
  • Customization of cannula shaft length (3 cm vs standard 5–8.3 cm) improved working space and reduced instrument interference.
  • Production cost was under $5 per cannula, suggesting 3DPCs may be a cost-effective and reusable alternative for small patients.
  • Study supports broader use of 3DPCs in laparoscopic procedures requiring long-jawed instruments or intricate tissue handling.

Buote

Veterinary Surgery

6

2023

3D printed cannulas for use in laparoscopic surgery in feline patients: A cadaveric study and case series

2023-6-vs-buote-2-d3982

Article Title: 3D printed cannulas for use in laparoscopic surgery in feline patients: A cadaveric study and case series

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

Quiz Results

Previously Missed Questions
70%

You answered 7 out of 10 questions correctly

Question 1:

❌ Incorrect. You answered: Answer

Correct answer:

Rationale

Question 1:

✅ Correct! You answered: Answer

Rationale

Author: Journal Name - 2025

Article Title

Key Findings

Something off with this question?
Tell us what needs fixing—drop your note below.

You’re flagging: [question text]

Thanks for your feedback!
We’ll review your comment as soon as possible.
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.