Your Custom Quiz

In Galliano 2022 et al., on vascular access ports, which factor did **not** correlate with the development of complications?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. No statistical correlation was found between catheter tip location and complications.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Catheter tip position.
No statistical correlation was found between catheter tip location and complications.

🔍 Key Findings

  • SVAPs placed in axillary (aSVAP) or femoral/external iliac veins (fSVAP) during limb amputation remained functional in 92.3% and 100% of cases, respectively.
  • Complication rates were lower in aSVAP (23.1%) and fSVAP (0%) compared to jSVAP (47.4%), although not statistically significant (P = .12).
  • No catastrophic complications occurred with aSVAP or fSVAP; 2 deaths occurred with jSVAP due to port-related issues.
  • Infection-related port removal was needed in 1 aSVAP (7.7%) and 2 jSVAPs (10.5%) — no removals were required in fSVAPs.
  • Tip placement of the catheter (e.g., right atrium vs. vena cava) did not correlate with complications (P = .66).
  • Shorter surgical time likely with aSVAP/fSVAP as they use the same surgical field as the limb amputation.
  • Survival time median was similar across groups (jSVAP: 177 days, aSVAP: 125 days, fSVAP: 122 days).
  • SVAP implantation during limb amputation offers a practical and safe alternative to separate jugular placement.

Galliano

Veterinary Surgery

7

2022

Subcutaneous vascular access port implantation in the axillary or femoral/external iliac vein at the time of full limb amputation in dogs

2022-7-VS-galliano-4

Article Title: Subcutaneous vascular access port implantation in the axillary or femoral/external iliac vein at the time of full limb amputation in dogs

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Bounds 2023 et al., on feline hip arthroscopy, which statement best describes feasibility of hip arthroscopy in cats with DJD?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. The two DJD hips showed no difference in arthroscopic access or visibility.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Feasible with comparable visualization to normal hips.
The two DJD hips showed no difference in arthroscopic access or visibility.

2023-8-VS-bounds-5

Article Title:

Journal:

In Bush 2023 et al., on canine salivary gland carcinoma, what was the concordance rate between incisional biopsy and final excisional histopathology?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Only 38.4% of incisional biopsies were completely concordant with final excisional histology.
Incorrect. The correct answer is 38%.
Only 38.4% of incisional biopsies were completely concordant with final excisional histology.

🔍 Key Findings

Source: Bush et al., 2023, Veterinary Surgery

  • Median survival time (MST) after surgery was 1886 days, which is significantly longer than previously reported.
  • Lymph node metastasis at surgery was a negative prognostic factor, reducing MST to 248 days (vs. 2340 days without nodal involvement).
  • Local recurrence occurred in 42% of dogs, with a median disease-free interval (DFI) of 191 days.
  • Metastatic disease occurred in 32% of dogs, most commonly to the lungs, with a median DFI of 299 days.
  • Histologic features (e.g., margin status, capsular, lymphatic, or vascular invasion) were not significantly correlated with recurrence or metastasis.
  • Facial nerve injury occurred in 9.7% perioperatively, especially after parotidectomy; intraoperative facial nerve transection led to long-term deficits.
  • Adjuvant therapies (chemotherapy, radiation, NSAIDs) did not significantly affect survival time.
  • Incisional biopsy was only 38% concordant with final excisional histology, suggesting limited reliability for definitive diagnosis.

Bush

Veterinary Surgery

3

2023

Outcomes and clinical features associated with surgically excised canine salivary gland carcinoma: A multi-institutional, retrospective, Veterinary Society of Surgical Oncology study

2023-3-VS-bush-5

Article Title: Outcomes and clinical features associated with surgically excised canine salivary gland carcinoma: A multi-institutional, retrospective, Veterinary Society of Surgical Oncology study

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Vandekerckhove 2024 et al., what was the main biomechanical interpretation of repeated stress testing on hip joints?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Repeat stress radiographs showed no lasting change in LImax—indicating elastic behavior
Incorrect. The correct answer is Elastic deformation occurred.
Repeat stress radiographs showed no lasting change in LImax—indicating elastic behavior

🔍 Key Findings Summary

  • Used VMBDmD to quantify hip laxity under increasing force in cadaveric dogs (n=34).
  • 90% of hips reached ≥90% of LImax at 95.32 N, defining this force as sufficient for subluxation.
  • LImax was not significantly influenced by osteoarthritis, weight, sex, or limb side.
  • Position of device (lever length) influenced rate of laxity acquisition, not final LImax.
  • LI curves were repeatable across 5 sessions, indicating elastic—not plastic—deformation.

Vandekerckhove

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

1

2024

Quantifying the Stress in Stress Radiographs to Determine Sufficient Laxity of the Coxofemoral Joint

2024-1-VCOT-vandekerckhove-3

Article Title: Quantifying the Stress in Stress Radiographs to Determine Sufficient Laxity of the Coxofemoral Joint

Journal: Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

In Hawker 2024 et al., on checklist attitudes, which group was most often reported as noncompliant with SSC use?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Surgeons were most commonly identified as noncompliant users.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Surgeons.
Surgeons were most commonly identified as noncompliant users.

🔍 Key Findings

  • 67.9% of respondents reported using SSCs, with most indicating frequent use (64% used in every surgery).
  • 78.7% agreed SSCs reduce complications, and 89.6% believed SSCs improve communication.
  • Respondents not using SSCs were more likely to view them as a waste of time (p < .001).
  • Forgetfulness (39.6%) and time constraints (36.5%) were leading reasons for checklist noncompletion.
  • Only 23.3% had SSC training during surgical residency, with newer diplomates more likely to have had exposure (p < .001).
  • Key strategies to improve uptake included: staff feedback modifications (67.9%), formal designation of initiator (48.6%), and training (52.2%).
  • Surgeons and OR staff were most commonly identified as noncompliant team members.
  • SSC use was more frequent in small animal practices, and mandating SSCs by management was favored but not always effective alone.

Hawker

Veterinary Surgery

5

2024

Attitudes towards surgical safety checklists among American College of Veterinary Surgeons diplomates

2024-5-VS-hawker-4

Article Title: Attitudes towards surgical safety checklists among American College of Veterinary Surgeons diplomates

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Bounds 2023 et al., on feline hip arthroscopy, which limb positioning provided optimal joint visualization?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. This positioning maximized joint space and visualization in all hips.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Neutral duction with 90° extension and traction.
This positioning maximized joint space and visualization in all hips.

2023-8-VS-bounds-1

Article Title:

Journal:

In Murphy 2024 et al., which factor was **not** significantly associated with contralateral CCLR risk?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Multivariate analysis found TPA, comorbidities, and meniscal status were **not** significant risk factors.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Tibial plateau angle (TPA).
Multivariate analysis found TPA, comorbidities, and meniscal status were **not** significant risk factors.

🔍 Key Findings Summary

  • Prevalence of contralateral CCLR in dogs ≥8 years and ≥15kg was 19.1%, notably lower than previous studies (33–50%).
  • Median time to contralateral CCLR was 12.9 months.
  • Older age reduced risk — 2% decrease per month of age (p=0.003).
  • Golden Retrievers and Labradors had significantly lower risk (p=0.028 and p=0.007, respectively).
  • No effect found from TPA, meniscal injury, or comorbidities (e.g., hip dysplasia, hypothyroidism).

Murphy

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

1

2024

The Prevalence and Risk Factors of Contralateral Cranial Cruciate Ligament Rupture in Medium-to-Large (≥15kg) Breed Dogs 8 Years of Age or Older

2024-1-VCOT-murphy-5

Article Title: The Prevalence and Risk Factors of Contralateral Cranial Cruciate Ligament Rupture in Medium-to-Large (≥15kg) Breed Dogs 8 Years of Age or Older

Journal: Veterinary and Comparative Orthopedics and Traumatology

In Cabreira 2026 et al., on dorsal AAI implant, which loading condition produced the highest stress during finite element analysis?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. The highest von Mises stress occurred during lateral flexion with the axis fixed under a 107 N load.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Lateral flexion with axis fixation.
The highest von Mises stress occurred during lateral flexion with the axis fixed under a 107 N load.

🔍 Key Findings

  • A patient-specific dorsal implant for atlantoaxial stabilization was developed using CT-based 3D modeling, enabling customized implant design and safe screw trajectory planning.
  • The implant accommodates six 1.7-mm bicortical locking screws, including two transarticular screws plus two screws in each vertebra (atlas lateral masses and axis lamina/spinous base).
  • The implant also functions as a drilling guide, allowing the screw-head housing to accept a threaded drill guide that ensures accurate drilling along predefined safe corridors.
  • An opening around the C1–C2 intervertebral foramen was incorporated to avoid injury to the C2 nerve root during dorsal instrumentation.
  • Finite element analysis evaluated implant behavior under flexion, extension, lateral flexion, and torsion using loads of 50 N (physiologic) and 107 N (supraphysiologic).
  • Maximum stress occurred during lateral flexion with axis fixation (425 MPa), which remained well below the titanium alloy yield strength of 880 MPa, indicating no mechanical failure.
  • Maximum implant displacement was minimal (0.13 mm), far less than the approximately 2 mm movement of the intact atlantoaxial joint under physiologic loading.
  • The implant design demonstrated adequate rigidity and mechanical safety in simulation, suggesting potential to improve dorsal stabilization while avoiding complications associated with PMMA constructs.

Cabreira

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology

1

2026

Development and Finite Element Analysis of a Patient-Specific Implant for Atlantoaxial Joint Stabilization via Dorsal Approach in Dogs

2026-1-vcot-cabreira-3

Article Title: Development and Finite Element Analysis of a Patient-Specific Implant for Atlantoaxial Joint Stabilization via Dorsal Approach in Dogs

Journal: Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology

In Alvarez 2022 et al., on rehabilitation modalities, what was a major limitation noted across many studies included in the systematic review?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Many studies suffered from small cohorts, high RoB, lack of blinding, and poorly standardized rehab protocols.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Small sample sizes and high RoB.
Many studies suffered from small cohorts, high RoB, lack of blinding, and poorly standardized rehab protocols.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Exercise-based rehabilitation showed benefits in 6 of 7 studies, including increased peak vertical force (PVF) and reduced lameness, though most had high risk of bias (RoB).
  • Cold compression therapy (CCT) had 2 high-quality (Level II, low RoB) studies showing improvements in pain scores, range of motion, and swelling, supporting its clinical use.
  • Extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) was supported by 2 Level II studies; only one had low RoB, showing short-term benefits in patellar ligament thickness and PVF, but no long-term benefit on bone healing.
  • Photobiomodulation (PBM) had mixed results across 3 Level II studies (all low RoB); only 1 showed positive impact on PVF, limiting its recommendation.
  • Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS) showed no significant impact on gait analysis or bone healing in a Level II, low RoB study.
  • Electrical muscle stimulation (EMS) improved lameness and thigh circumference in one Level III study, but had high-moderate RoB and involved experimentally-induced CCL rupture, limiting clinical relevance.
  • No modality beyond exercise and CCT had consistent or strong evidence for efficacy in post-TPLO or extracapsular repair rehabilitation.
  • The absence of standardized protocols, small sample sizes, and inconsistent outcome measures limited the generalizability of findings.

Alvarez

Veterinary Surgery

2

2022

Systematic review of postoperative rehabilitation interventions after cranial cruciate ligament surgery in dogs

2022-2-VS-alvarez-3

Article Title: Systematic review of postoperative rehabilitation interventions after cranial cruciate ligament surgery in dogs

Journal: Veterinary Surgery

In Beer 2026 et al., on synovial CRP biomarkers, which finding best described synovial CRP concentrations among disease groups?

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Correct. Synovial CRP distinguished inflammatory from non-inflammatory arthropathies but not specific inflammatory causes.
Incorrect. The correct answer is Synovial CRP was significantly lower in osteoarthritis than both IMPA and infective arthritis.
Synovial CRP distinguished inflammatory from non-inflammatory arthropathies but not specific inflammatory causes.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Synovial CRP was significantly lower in osteoarthritis than both IMPA and bacterial infective arthritis (p=0.001 for both comparisons).
  • Synovial CRP could not differentiate IMPA from bacterial infective arthritis (p=0.721), limiting its value as a stand-alone diagnostic test.
  • Median synovial CRP concentrations were 0.2 mg/L (OA), 65.79 mg/L (IMPA), and 60.8 mg/L (infective arthritis).
  • Synovial CRP is useful for distinguishing inflammatory from non-inflammatory arthropathies, but not infectious from sterile inflammatory disease.
  • Synovial neutrophil count positively correlated with synovial CRP in IMPA and infective arthritis, supporting CRP as a marker of joint inflammation.
  • Serum and synovial CRP showed a moderate positive correlation in IMPA cases (r=0.52), although not statistically significant.
  • Higher synovial CRP was associated with increased lameness severity in osteoarthritis (r=0.91, p=0.004).
  • Diagnosis of bacterial infective arthritis remains multifactorial, requiring integration of history, cytology, culture, and treatment response rather than CRP alone.

Beer

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology

3

2026

Synovial Fluid C-Reactive Protein as a Biomarker in Osteoarthritis, Immune-Mediated Polyarthritis and Bacterial Infective Arthritis

2026-3-vcot-beer-1

Article Title: Synovial Fluid C-Reactive Protein as a Biomarker in Osteoarthritis, Immune-Mediated Polyarthritis and Bacterial Infective Arthritis

Journal: Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology

Quiz Results

Previously Missed Questions
70%

You answered 7 out of 10 questions correctly

Question 1:

❌ Incorrect. You answered: Answer

Correct answer:

Rationale

Question 1:

✅ Correct! You answered: Answer

Rationale

Author: Journal Name - 2025

Article Title

Key Findings

Something off with this question?
Tell us what needs fixing—drop your note below.

You’re flagging: [question text]

Thanks for your feedback!
We’ll review your comment as soon as possible.
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.