Saylak et al: Locked plate versus modified clamp-rod internal fixation for feline corpus ilium fractures: A comparative clinical study
Veterinary Surgery 6, 2026

Locked plate versus modified clamp-rod internal fixation for feline corpus ilium fractures: A comparative clinical study

🔍 Key Findings

  • All 36 feline corpus ilium fractures achieved union after fixation with either M-CRIF (n = 18) or conventional locking plates (n = 18).
  • M-CRIF produced faster mid-term radiographic healing, with higher day-45 healing scores than locking plates (2.72 ± 0.46 vs 1.89 ± 0.83; p = .002); later healing scores were comparable.
  • M-CRIF better preserved pelvic canal dimensions, with significantly less sacral index narrowing than plate fixation (p = .005).
  • Screw loosening occurred in 22.2% (4/18) of plate cases but in none of the M-CRIF cases; one plate case required revision with an additional dorsal plate.
  • The modified implant increased screw-placement flexibility, permitting four locking screws cranial and two caudal to the fracture while allowing clamps to be positioned at the required location and angle.
  • M-CRIF required longer operative application, primarily because the rod had to be contoured intraoperatively, although application time decreased with surgeon experience.
  • Neurological deficits decreased from 22.2% preoperatively to 5.5% postoperatively, suggesting generally favorable neurological recovery in the selected population.
  • M-CRIF was considered a reliable alternative to conventional plating, offering greater fixation stability, fewer implant-related complications, and improved preservation of pelvic canal width.

Simini Surgery Review Podcast

How critical is this paper for crushing the Boards?

🚨 Must-know. I’d bet on seeing this.

📚 Useful background, not must-know.

💤 Skip it. Doubt it’ll ever show up.

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the articles vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

Saylak et al: Locked plate versus modified clamp-rod internal fixation for feline corpus ilium fractures: A comparative clinical study
Veterinary Surgery 6, 2026

🔍 Key Findings

  • All 36 feline corpus ilium fractures achieved union after fixation with either M-CRIF (n = 18) or conventional locking plates (n = 18).
  • M-CRIF produced faster mid-term radiographic healing, with higher day-45 healing scores than locking plates (2.72 ± 0.46 vs 1.89 ± 0.83; p = .002); later healing scores were comparable.
  • M-CRIF better preserved pelvic canal dimensions, with significantly less sacral index narrowing than plate fixation (p = .005).
  • Screw loosening occurred in 22.2% (4/18) of plate cases but in none of the M-CRIF cases; one plate case required revision with an additional dorsal plate.
  • The modified implant increased screw-placement flexibility, permitting four locking screws cranial and two caudal to the fracture while allowing clamps to be positioned at the required location and angle.
  • M-CRIF required longer operative application, primarily because the rod had to be contoured intraoperatively, although application time decreased with surgeon experience.
  • Neurological deficits decreased from 22.2% preoperatively to 5.5% postoperatively, suggesting generally favorable neurological recovery in the selected population.
  • M-CRIF was considered a reliable alternative to conventional plating, offering greater fixation stability, fewer implant-related complications, and improved preservation of pelvic canal width.

Simini Surgery Review Podcast

Know What Matters in the Literature - and Why

We distill peer-reviewed surgical studies into clinically relevant summaries and
exam-style questions, so you can make informed decisions with confidence.

Free Access. No Spam. Just Smarter Surgical Learning

Multiple Choice Questions on this study

In Saylak 2026 et al., on feline ilium fixation, what technical feature of the M-CRIF construct facilitated stable fixation in the small feline ilium?

A. Each fracture fragment was stabilized with a maximum of one nonlocking screw.
B. The rod eliminated the need for screw fixation to the ilium.
C. The clamps could be positioned at required regions and angles, permitting multiple locking screws to be placed at 90 degrees and locked securely.
D. The implant required bicortical transsacral screws for stability.
E. The system depended on polymethylmethacrylate to secure the clamps to the ilium.

Answer: The clamps could be positioned at required regions and angles, permitting multiple locking screws to be placed at 90 degrees and locked securely.

Explanation: The adjustable M-CRIF clamps permitted flexible positioning and increased screw density; the study describes placement of four locking screws cranially and two caudally to the fracture line.
In Saylak 2026 et al., on feline ilium fixation, which statement best describes postoperative preservation of the pelvic canal?

A. Severe pelvic canal narrowing occurred commonly with both techniques.
B. Locking plate fixation produced significantly less sacral index narrowing than M-CRIF.
C. There was no measurable difference in sacral index between fixation groups.
D. M-CRIF produced significantly less sacral index narrowing than locking plate fixation.
E. Pelvic canal narrowing was assessed only by owner questionnaire.

Answer: M-CRIF produced significantly less sacral index narrowing than locking plate fixation.

Explanation: Sacral index measurements demonstrated significantly less pelvic canal narrowing with M-CRIF (p = .005), supporting improved preservation of canal width.
In Saylak 2026 et al., on feline ilium fixation, which implant-related complication most clearly distinguished conventional locking plate fixation from M-CRIF?

A. Rod migration occurred in four M-CRIF cases.
B. Screw loosening occurred in four locking plate cases but in no M-CRIF cases.
C. Implant infection occurred exclusively in the locking plate group.
D. Pelvic canal collapse requiring colectomy occurred exclusively after M-CRIF.
E. Fracture nonunion occurred in four locking plate cases.

Answer: Screw loosening occurred in four locking plate cases but in no M-CRIF cases.

Explanation: Screw loosening developed in 4/18 (22.2%) locking plate cases and in no M-CRIF cases; one affected plate case required revision surgery.
In Saylak 2026 et al., on feline ilium fixation, what operative trade-off was associated with use of the M-CRIF system?

A. M-CRIF was faster to apply because no intraoperative implant adjustment was required.
B. M-CRIF required a longer surgical application time because the rod was contoured intraoperatively to the anatomy of the ilium.
C. M-CRIF required a second dorsal surgical approach in every case.
D. M-CRIF required postoperative external skeletal fixation to maintain reduction.
E. M-CRIF prevented anatomical visualization of the fracture during reduction.

Answer: M-CRIF required a longer surgical application time because the rod was contoured intraoperatively to the anatomy of the ilium.

Explanation: The M-CRIF procedure took longer primarily because the rod required intraoperative anatomical contouring, although application time decreased as the surgeon became more familiar with the technique.
In Saylak 2026 et al., on feline ilium fixation, which finding best characterized radiographic fracture healing following M-CRIF compared with conventional locking plate fixation?

A. M-CRIF resulted in significantly higher healing scores at every postoperative assessment.
B. Locking plates resulted in significantly higher healing scores at day 45.
C. M-CRIF resulted in significantly higher healing scores at day 45, but later healing scores were not significantly different between groups.
D. Locking plates resulted in faster complete union despite more screw loosening.
E. Neither fixation method achieved complete radiographic union.

Answer: M-CRIF resulted in significantly higher healing scores at day 45, but later healing scores were not significantly different between groups.

Explanation: M-CRIF had a higher mean healing score at day 45 (2.72 versus 1.89; p = .002), whereas between-group differences at days 60 and 120 were not significant.

Access the full library of surgical summaries and exam-style questions.

Educational content developed independently and supported by Simini.

The maker of Simini Protect Lavage.

Something off with this article?
Tell us what needs fixing—drop your note below.
Thanks for flagging this!
We’ll review your note as soon as possible.
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Anything to add to this article?
Know a finding or detail we missed? Share it below.
Thanks for the suggestion!
We’ll review it as soon as possible.
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.