Blatt et al: Surgical approach for common carotid ligation at the level of the medial retropharyngeal lymph node in dogs: A comparative cadaveric study
Veterinary Surgery 6, 2026

Surgical approach for common carotid ligation at the level of the medial retropharyngeal lymph node in dogs: A comparative cadaveric study

🔍 Key Findings

  • Both lateral and ventral approaches reliably permitted CCA isolation and ligation at the level of the MRLN, with or without concurrent lymphadenectomy; bilateral temporary ligation was successful in all 12 cadavers.
  • The CCA was consistently dorsomedial to the MRLN, while the MRLN was medial to the caudodorsal mandibular salivary gland (MSG), providing reproducible landmarks for surgical orientation.
  • Concurrent lymphadenectomy can be incorporated into the same surgical approach, permitting removal of the mandibular and medial retropharyngeal lymph nodes while gaining access to the CCA.
  • Brachycephalic dogs had a significantly deeper CCA from the lateral approach than the ventral approach (44.8 ± 12.8 vs 29.3 ± 8.3 mm; p = .02), which may influence approach selection.
  • No gross vascular trauma occurred after temporary CCA ligation, although careful dissection was required to avoid the adjacent vagosympathetic trunk.
  • One inadvertent mandibular salivary gland capsular disruption occurred during a lateral approach without lymphadenectomy; Figure 2 demonstrates this complication and the close relationship of the MRLN, CCA, and vagosympathetic trunk.
  • CCA ligation was performed at the cranial two-thirds of the MRLN, caudal to the internal carotid branching, placing the operative site near the carotid sinus and raising potential concerns for bradycardia and hypotension in live patients.
  • Clinical efficacy remains unproven because this was a CT/cadaveric study; the authors specifically recommend in vivo evaluation of hemorrhage control, hemodynamic effects, and procedural complications.

Simini Surgery Review Podcast

How critical is this paper for crushing the Boards?

🚨 Must-know. I’d bet on seeing this.

📚 Useful background, not must-know.

💤 Skip it. Doubt it’ll ever show up.

Thanks for the feedback!
We'll keep fine-tuning the articles vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
Mind trying that again?

Blatt et al: Surgical approach for common carotid ligation at the level of the medial retropharyngeal lymph node in dogs: A comparative cadaveric study
Veterinary Surgery 6, 2026

🔍 Key Findings

  • Both lateral and ventral approaches reliably permitted CCA isolation and ligation at the level of the MRLN, with or without concurrent lymphadenectomy; bilateral temporary ligation was successful in all 12 cadavers.
  • The CCA was consistently dorsomedial to the MRLN, while the MRLN was medial to the caudodorsal mandibular salivary gland (MSG), providing reproducible landmarks for surgical orientation.
  • Concurrent lymphadenectomy can be incorporated into the same surgical approach, permitting removal of the mandibular and medial retropharyngeal lymph nodes while gaining access to the CCA.
  • Brachycephalic dogs had a significantly deeper CCA from the lateral approach than the ventral approach (44.8 ± 12.8 vs 29.3 ± 8.3 mm; p = .02), which may influence approach selection.
  • No gross vascular trauma occurred after temporary CCA ligation, although careful dissection was required to avoid the adjacent vagosympathetic trunk.
  • One inadvertent mandibular salivary gland capsular disruption occurred during a lateral approach without lymphadenectomy; Figure 2 demonstrates this complication and the close relationship of the MRLN, CCA, and vagosympathetic trunk.
  • CCA ligation was performed at the cranial two-thirds of the MRLN, caudal to the internal carotid branching, placing the operative site near the carotid sinus and raising potential concerns for bradycardia and hypotension in live patients.
  • Clinical efficacy remains unproven because this was a CT/cadaveric study; the authors specifically recommend in vivo evaluation of hemorrhage control, hemodynamic effects, and procedural complications.

Simini Surgery Review Podcast

Know What Matters in the Literature - and Why

We distill peer-reviewed surgical studies into clinically relevant summaries and
exam-style questions, so you can make informed decisions with confidence.

Free Access. No Spam. Just Smarter Surgical Learning

Multiple Choice Questions on this study

In Blatt 2026 et al., on carotid ligation approaches, which anatomical relationship was consistently identified and provides a key landmark for surgical isolation of the common carotid artery?

A. The CCA was ventrolateral to the MRLN
B. The CCA was dorsomedial to the MRLN
C. The CCA was lateral to the mandibular salivary gland
D. The CCA was superficial to the linguofacial vein
E. The CCA was located between the mandibular lymph nodes

Answer: The CCA was dorsomedial to the MRLN

Explanation: The CCA was consistently located dorsomedial to the MRLN on CT and cadaveric evaluation, making the MRLN an important landmark for carotid isolation.
In Blatt 2026 et al., on carotid ligation approaches, which statement best describes the feasibility of the lateral and ventral approaches evaluated in the cadaveric portion of the study?

A. Only the lateral approach permitted bilateral CCA ligation
B. Only approaches incorporating lymphadenectomy allowed CCA isolation
C. Both approaches allowed successful CCA access and bilateral temporary ligation in all cadavers
D. The ventral approach consistently caused gross vascular trauma
E. Neither approach permitted CCA isolation without removal of the MRLN

Answer: Both approaches allowed successful CCA access and bilateral temporary ligation in all cadavers

Explanation: Both lateral and ventral approaches provided consistent CCA access, and temporary bilateral ligation was successfully completed in all cadavers with no gross evidence of vascular trauma.
In Blatt 2026 et al., on carotid ligation approaches, what potential physiologic complication did the authors identify because CCA ligation at the cranial two-thirds of the MRLN occurs near the carotid sinus?

A. Acute hyperthermia secondary to sympathetic stimulation
B. Bradycardia and hypotension from baroreceptor stimulation
C. Hypertension and tachycardia from vagal blockade
D. Respiratory arrest from phrenic nerve stimulation
E. Hyperglycemia from carotid body manipulation

Answer: Bradycardia and hypotension from baroreceptor stimulation

Explanation: The ligation site lies near the carotid sinus; therefore, the authors highlighted potential baroreceptor-mediated bradycardia and hypotension as effects that should be monitored in future in vivo studies.
In Blatt 2026 et al., on carotid ligation approaches, CT evaluation of brachycephalic dogs demonstrated which finding that may influence selection between the lateral and ventral approaches?

A. The CCA was significantly deeper from the ventral approach than the lateral approach
B. The CCA could not be consistently identified from the lateral approach
C. The MRLN was absent significantly more often in brachycephalic dogs
D. The CCA was significantly deeper from the lateral approach than the ventral approach
E. The CCA cross-sectional area was significantly smaller in brachycephalic dogs

Answer: The CCA was significantly deeper from the lateral approach than the ventral approach

Explanation: In brachycephalic dogs, mean CCA depth was 44.8 ± 12.8 mm laterally versus 29.3 ± 8.3 mm ventrally (p = .02), a potentially relevant consideration for surgical planning.
In Blatt 2026 et al., on carotid ligation approaches, which structure requires particular care during dissection of the carotid sheath because of the risk of inadvertent injury?

A. Recurrent laryngeal nerve
B. Hypoglossal nerve
C. Phrenic nerve
D. Vagosympathetic trunk
E. Accessory nerve

Answer: Vagosympathetic trunk

Explanation: The vagosympathetic trunk lies within the neurovascular region adjacent to the CCA, and the authors specifically emphasized careful dissection to avoid inadvertent trauma.

Access the full library of surgical summaries and exam-style questions.

Educational content developed independently and supported by Simini.

The maker of Simini Protect Lavage.

Something off with this article?
Tell us what needs fixing—drop your note below.
Thanks for flagging this!
We’ll review your note as soon as possible.
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Anything to add to this article?
Know a finding or detail we missed? Share it below.
Thanks for the suggestion!
We’ll review it as soon as possible.
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.