🔍 Key Findings
Design: Ex vivo cadaver study (n=8 dogs, 24 sites)
Comparison: Freehand vs. 3D-printed drill guide-assisted ventral slot (GAVS vs FHVS)
Findings:
- GAVS produced slots not significantly different from planned dimensions (p = .722–.875)
- FHVS produced significantly shorter slots than intended (p < .01)
- No difference in surgical time (p = .071)
- Shape ratio and slot divergence from midline were similar between groups (p > .4)
- Use of guide significantly reduced variability in slot position (63% → 29%), shape (65% → 24%), and divergence (54% → 50%)
Conclusion: 3D-printed guides improved accuracy and consistency of ventral slot creation by novice surgeons; supports future evaluation in live dogs and small breeds
Simini Surgery Review Podcast
🔍 Key Findings
Design: Ex vivo cadaver study (n=8 dogs, 24 sites)
Comparison: Freehand vs. 3D-printed drill guide-assisted ventral slot (GAVS vs FHVS)
Findings:
- GAVS produced slots not significantly different from planned dimensions (p = .722–.875)
- FHVS produced significantly shorter slots than intended (p < .01)
- No difference in surgical time (p = .071)
- Shape ratio and slot divergence from midline were similar between groups (p > .4)
- Use of guide significantly reduced variability in slot position (63% → 29%), shape (65% → 24%), and divergence (54% → 50%)
Conclusion: 3D-printed guides improved accuracy and consistency of ventral slot creation by novice surgeons; supports future evaluation in live dogs and small breeds
Simini Surgery Review Podcast
Know What Matters in the Literature - and Why
We distill peer-reviewed surgical studies into clinically relevant summaries and
exam-style questions, so you can make informed decisions with confidence.
Free Access. No Spam. Just Smarter Surgical Learning
Multiple Choice Questions on this study
Access the full library of surgical summaries and exam-style questions.







