← Articles

Cruciani et al: A modified approach to portal placement for arthroscopic management of osteochondritis dissecans lesions of the tarsocrural joint in 15 dogs (19 tarsi)
Veterinary Surgery 1, 2025

🔍 Key Findings

  • Study Design: Retrospective case series of 15 dogs (19 tarsi) with talar OCD.
  • Technique: Modified arthroscopic approach with both scope and instrument portals on the same side as the lesion.
  • Outcomes:
    • Good to excellent mid-to-long-term outcomes in 11/14 dogs.
    • Statistically significant improvement in CBPI (p < .05) and VAS scores (p < .05).
    • Minor postoperative complications (synovial cysts) in 4/13 tarsi, all resolved spontaneously.
    • No major intraoperative complications; 1/19 required mini-arthrotomy due to fragment size.
  • Degenerative Joint Disease (DJD): Progression noted in 10/14 cases, despite good functional outcomes.
  • Fragment Characteristics: Multiple osteochondral fragments were present in most cases, with 17/19 lesions on the medial talar ridge.
  • Technical Advantage: Lower conversion rate to arthrotomy (1/19) compared to previous studies (Gielen et al. and Miller & Beale).
A modified approach to portal placement for arthroscopic management of osteochondritis dissecans lesions of the tarsocrural joint in 15 dogs (19 tarsi)
A modified approach to portal placement for arthroscopic management of osteochondritis dissecans lesions of the tarsocrural joint in 15 dogs (19 tarsi)
A modified approach to portal placement for arthroscopic management of osteochondritis dissecans lesions of the tarsocrural joint in 15 dogs (19 tarsi)
A modified approach to portal placement for arthroscopic management of osteochondritis dissecans lesions of the tarsocrural joint in 15 dogs (19 tarsi)
A modified approach to portal placement for arthroscopic management of osteochondritis dissecans lesions of the tarsocrural joint in 15 dogs (19 tarsi)
A modified approach to portal placement for arthroscopic management of osteochondritis dissecans lesions of the tarsocrural joint in 15 dogs (19 tarsi)
A modified approach to portal placement for arthroscopic management of osteochondritis dissecans lesions of the tarsocrural joint in 15 dogs (19 tarsi)
A modified approach to portal placement for arthroscopic management of osteochondritis dissecans lesions of the tarsocrural joint in 15 dogs (19 tarsi)
A modified approach to portal placement for arthroscopic management of osteochondritis dissecans lesions of the tarsocrural joint in 15 dogs (19 tarsi)
A modified approach to portal placement for arthroscopic management of osteochondritis dissecans lesions of the tarsocrural joint in 15 dogs (19 tarsi)
A modified approach to portal placement for arthroscopic management of osteochondritis dissecans lesions of the tarsocrural joint in 15 dogs (19 tarsi)
A modified approach to portal placement for arthroscopic management of osteochondritis dissecans lesions of the tarsocrural joint in 15 dogs (19 tarsi)
A modified approach to portal placement for arthroscopic management of osteochondritis dissecans lesions of the tarsocrural joint in 15 dogs (19 tarsi)
A modified approach to portal placement for arthroscopic management of osteochondritis dissecans lesions of the tarsocrural joint in 15 dogs (19 tarsi)

Simini Surgery Review Podcast

How critical is this paper for crushing the Boards?

🚨 Must-know. I’d bet on seeing this.

📚 Useful background, not must-know.

💤 Skip it. Doubt it’ll ever show up.

Thanks for the feedback!
‍We'll keep fine-tuning the articles vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
‍Mind trying that again?
← Articles

Cruciani et al: A modified approach to portal placement for arthroscopic management of osteochondritis dissecans lesions of the tarsocrural joint in 15 dogs (19 tarsi)
Veterinary Surgery 1, 2025

🔍 Key Findings

  • Study Design: Retrospective case series of 15 dogs (19 tarsi) with talar OCD.
  • Technique: Modified arthroscopic approach with both scope and instrument portals on the same side as the lesion.
  • Outcomes:
    • Good to excellent mid-to-long-term outcomes in 11/14 dogs.
    • Statistically significant improvement in CBPI (p < .05) and VAS scores (p < .05).
    • Minor postoperative complications (synovial cysts) in 4/13 tarsi, all resolved spontaneously.
    • No major intraoperative complications; 1/19 required mini-arthrotomy due to fragment size.
  • Degenerative Joint Disease (DJD): Progression noted in 10/14 cases, despite good functional outcomes.
  • Fragment Characteristics: Multiple osteochondral fragments were present in most cases, with 17/19 lesions on the medial talar ridge.
  • Technical Advantage: Lower conversion rate to arthrotomy (1/19) compared to previous studies (Gielen et al. and Miller & Beale).

Simini Surgery Review Podcast

Know What Matters in the Literature - and Why

We distill peer-reviewed surgical studies into clinically relevant summaries and
exam-style questions, so you can make informed decisions with confidence.

Free Access. No Spam. Just Smarter Surgical Learning

Multiple Choice Questions on this study

In Cruciani 2025 et al., on portal placement, what was the most common complication following surgery?

A. Surgical site infection
B. Septic arthritis
C. Nerve damage
D. Synovial cyst formation
E. Incomplete fragment removal

Answer: Synovial cyst formation

Explanation: Synovial cysts occurred in 4 of 13 dogs with follow-up data; all were considered minor complications.
In Cruciani 2025 et al., on portal placement, what functional outcome was observed in most dogs at long-term follow-up?

A. Persistent lameness in >50%
B. Return to normal function in all cases
C. Acceptable or full function in majority
D. Unacceptable function in most
E. Marked improvement only after second surgery

Answer: Acceptable or full function in majority

Explanation: 11 of 14 dogs had full or acceptable function at long-term follow-up.
In Cruciani 2025 et al., on portal placement, which pain scoring tool showed significant postoperative improvement?

A. SF-36
B. CBPI
C. PennHIP
D. Glasgow CMPS
E. LOAD

Answer: CBPI

Explanation: Canine Brief Pain Inventory (CBPI) scores significantly improved from pre-op to final follow-up.
In Cruciani 2025 et al., on portal placement, what was the primary reason for modifying the arthroscopic portal?

A. To shorten surgical time
B. To avoid neurovascular structures
C. To improve cosmetic appearance
D. To improve fragment access and removal
E. To minimize cartilage trauma

Answer: To improve fragment access and removal

Explanation: Placing the portal on the same side as the lesion facilitated easier removal of osteochondral fragments.
In Cruciani 2025 et al., on portal placement, how often was complete fragment removal achieved?

A. 19 of 19 cases
B. 15 of 19 cases
C. 13 of 19 cases
D. 10 of 19 cases
E. 17 of 19 cases

Answer: 17 of 19 cases

Explanation: Complete removal was achieved in 17 of 19 joints using the modified ipsilateral portal technique.

Access the full library of surgical summaries and exam-style questions.

Get Instant Access

Educational content developed independently and supported by Simini.

The maker of Simini Protect Lavage.

Review More Key Summaries from this Veterinary Surgery Journal Issue

Woelfel

 et al: 

Subaxial cervical articular process subluxation and dislocation: Cervical locked facet injuries in dogs

Baldo Clemot

 et al: 

Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbosacral spine in neutral and flexed position for presurgical assessment of clinically affected dogs with degenerative lumbosacral stenosis

Danielski

 et al: 

Complications after proximal abducting ulnar osteotomy and prognostic factors in 66 dogs

Jones

 et al: 

Comparison of mortality of brachycephalic dogs undergoing partial staphylectomy using conventional incisional, carbon dioxide laser, or bipolar vessel sealing device

Lopez Barroso

 et al: 

Accuracy of a table‐bound reduction and drill guide system for minimally invasive sacroiliac screw placement in cats