← Articles

Glenn et al: Evaluation of a client questionnaire at diagnosing surgical site infections in an active surveillance system
Veterinary Surgery 1, 2024

🔍 Key Findings Summary

  • Population: 754 soft tissue or orthopedic procedures in dogs and cats
  • SSI Rate: 62/754 (8.2%)
  • Algorithms Evaluated:
    • Algorithm 1: Highest sensitivity (87.1%) → best for "rule-out"
    • Algorithm 2: Highest specificity (97.9%) → best for "rule-in"
    • Algorithm 3: Highest overall accuracy (95.5%)
  • Active vs. Passive Surveillance:
    • Active surveillance detected 12 additional SSIs (19.4%) missed by passive
    • Active surveillance increased detection rate by 24%
  • Timing: Most SSIs occurred within 30 days; late infections (after 90 days) were rare and implant-related
  • Conclusion: Client questionnaires are a valid and scalable tool for SSI detection; active surveillance improves outcomes

Simini Surgery Review Podcast

How critical is this paper for crushing the Boards?

🚨 Must-know. I’d bet on seeing this.

📚 Useful background, not must-know.

💤 Skip it. Doubt it’ll ever show up.

Thanks for the feedback!
‍We'll keep fine-tuning the articles vault.
Oops — didn’t go through.
‍Mind trying that again?
← Articles

Glenn et al: Evaluation of a client questionnaire at diagnosing surgical site infections in an active surveillance system
Veterinary Surgery 1, 2024

🔍 Key Findings Summary

  • Population: 754 soft tissue or orthopedic procedures in dogs and cats
  • SSI Rate: 62/754 (8.2%)
  • Algorithms Evaluated:
    • Algorithm 1: Highest sensitivity (87.1%) → best for "rule-out"
    • Algorithm 2: Highest specificity (97.9%) → best for "rule-in"
    • Algorithm 3: Highest overall accuracy (95.5%)
  • Active vs. Passive Surveillance:
    • Active surveillance detected 12 additional SSIs (19.4%) missed by passive
    • Active surveillance increased detection rate by 24%
  • Timing: Most SSIs occurred within 30 days; late infections (after 90 days) were rare and implant-related
  • Conclusion: Client questionnaires are a valid and scalable tool for SSI detection; active surveillance improves outcomes

Simini Surgery Review Podcast

Know What Matters in the Literature - and Why

We distill peer-reviewed surgical studies into clinically relevant summaries and
exam-style questions, so you can make informed decisions with confidence.

Free Access. No Spam. Just Smarter Surgical Learning

Multiple Choice Questions on this study

In Glenn 2024 et al., on questionnaire specificity, which algorithm had the highest specificity for SSI detection?

A. Algorithm 1
B. Algorithm 2
C. Algorithm 3
D. All equal
E. None reported

Answer: Algorithm 2

Explanation: Algorithm 2 had the highest specificity (97.9%) and is preferred when false positives must be minimized.
In Glenn 2024 et al., on infection timing, what was the most common time frame for diagnosed SSIs?

A. <7 days post-op
B. 8–14 days post-op
C. 15–30 days post-op
D. >30 days post-op
E. >90 days post-op

Answer: 15–30 days post-op

Explanation: Most SSIs were identified within 15–30 days of surgery, consistent with CDC surveillance periods.
In Glenn 2024 et al., on algorithm performance, which algorithm had the highest sensitivity for identifying SSIs?

A. Algorithm 1
B. Algorithm 2
C. Algorithm 3
D. Manual chart review
E. Passive surveillance

Answer: Algorithm 1

Explanation: Algorithm 1 had the highest sensitivity (87.1%), making it the best for screening or ruling out SSIs.
In Glenn 2024 et al., on overall diagnostic performance, which algorithm had the highest accuracy?

A. Algorithm 1
B. Algorithm 2
C. Algorithm 3
D. Chart review
E. Passive system

Answer: Algorithm 3

Explanation: Algorithm 3 had the highest overall accuracy (95.5%), balancing sensitivity and specificity.
In Glenn 2024 et al., on comparative surveillance methods, how did active surveillance affect SSI detection rate?

A. Increased by 10%
B. Increased by 18%
C. Increased by 24%
D. No effect
E. Decreased slightly

Answer: Increased by 24%

Explanation: Active surveillance increased detection rate by 24% over passive surveillance alone.

Access the full library of surgical summaries and exam-style questions.

Get Instant Access

Educational content developed independently and supported by Simini.

The maker of Simini Protect Lavage.

Review More Key Summaries from this Veterinary Surgery Journal Issue

Timmermans

 et al: 

Evaluation of soft palate thickness in brachycephalic dogs 3 months after folded flap palatoplasty versus standard staphylectomy

Seger

 et al: 

Presentation, diagnosis, and management of gossypibomas in veterinary specialty hospitals: A multi-institutional study of 21 cases

Bilmont

 et al: 

Assessment of BFX cup version in a three-dimensional model simulating the ventrodorsal radiographic view

McCarthy

 et al: 

Accuracy of a drilling with a custom 3D printed guide or free‐hand technique in canine experimental sacroiliac luxations

Paulick

 et al: 

Ex vivo comparison of lateral plate repairs of experimental oblique ilial fractures in cats